Journal: PLOS Pathogens
Article Title: RNF20 dynamically regulates RIG-I and MDA5 transcription and degradation via nucleocytoplasmic translocation to balance antiviral signaling
doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1013890
Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) IFN-β luciferase reporter assay of HEK293T cells transiently transfected with HA-tagged RIG-I, MDA5, MAVS, STING, or TBK1 (100 ng) together with either RNF20-Flag expression plasmid (100 ng) or an empty control vector, followed by infection with VSV-GFP (MOI = 1.0) for 12h . (B, C) HEK293T cells were transiently co-transfected with IFN-β-luc (120 ng), pRL-TK (60 ng), and HA-tagged RIG-I or MDA5, together with increasing doses of RNF20-Flag expression plasmid (0, 50, 100, 200, 300, or 400 ng). (D) HEK293T cells were transiently co-transfected with IFN-β-luc (120 ng), pRL-TK (60 ng), poly(I:C), and Flag-RIG-I (100 ng), together with RNF20-interfering plasmid. (E, F) HEK293T cells were co-transfected with Flag-RNF20 and either Myc-tagged RIG-I or Myc-tagged MDA5, followed by infection with VSV-GFP (MOI = 1.0) for 12h . Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated using an anti-Flag antibody and analyzed by immunoblotting with the indicated antibodies. (G, H) Confocal microscopy analysis of HeLa cells infected with NDV for 24 h, followed by immunostaining with anti-RNF20, anti-RIG-I, or anti-MDA5 primary antibodies, and Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (green) or Cy3-conjugated goat anti-rat IgG (red) secondary antibodies. (I, J) Schematic representation of RIG-I and MDA5 structures and their truncated mutants. (K) HEK293T cells were co-transfected with Myc-tagged MDA5 or its mutants together with Flag-RNF20, followed by infection with VSV-GFP (MOI = 1.0) for 12h . Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated using an anti-Myc antibody and analyzed by immunoblotting with the indicated antibodies. (L, M) HEK293T cells were co-transfected with Myc-tagged MDA5 or RIG-I (wild-type or dCARD mutants) together with Flag-RNF20, followed by infection with VSV-GFP (MOI = 1.0) for 12h . Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated using an anti-Myc antibody and analyzed by immunoblotting with the indicated antibodies. Data are presented as mean ± SD; *** p < 0.001; Scale bars = 10 µm. The results were repeated in three independent experiments with three replicas each. (Note: UI denotes uninfected virus; pcDNA3.1: empty vector control; shNC: non-targeting shRNA control).
Article Snippet: The antibodies IgG were purchased from the indicated manufacturer’s, including HRP-conjugated anti-mouse or rabbit IgG (Cell Signaling Technologies, 7076 and 7074), Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated Goat anti-rabbit IgG (Sangon Biotech, D110061), Cy3-conjugated Goat anti-mouse IgG (Sangon Biotech, D110088), Anti-Flag tag mouse monoclonal antibody (Sangon Biotech, D191041), Anti-HA tag mouse monoclonal antibody (Abmart, 26D11), Anti-Myc tag mouse monoclonal antibody (Abmart, 19C2), Anti-GFP tag mouse monoclonal antibody (ABclonal,AE012), anti-β-tubulin (Abmart, 2H4), anti-Lamin B1 (Beyotime, AF1408), anti-RNF20 (proteintech, 21625–1-AP), anti-RNF20 (Santa Cruz biotechnology, sc-517358), anti-RIG-I (Cell Signaling Technologies, 3743), anti-MDA5 (Cell Signaling Technologies, 5321), anti-MAVS (Cell Signaling Technologies, 3993), anti-TBK1 (Cell Signaling Technologies, 3504), anti- p -TBK1 (Cell Signaling Technologies, 5483), anti-IRF3 (Cell Signaling Technologies, 11904), anti- p -IRF3 (Cell Signaling Technologies, 4947), anti-STING (Cell Signaling Technologies, 13647S), anti-STAT1 (Sangon Biotech, D120084).
Techniques: Luciferase, Reporter Assay, Transfection, Expressing, Plasmid Preparation, Control, Infection, Immunoprecipitation, Western Blot, Confocal Microscopy, Immunostaining, Virus, shRNA